Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Featured News Stocks Technology

Southwest Airlines must face pilots’ union lawsuit over threats

post-img

Southwest Airlines must face a lawsuit accusing the carrier of illegally intimidating and disciplining pilots who participate in its more than 9,000-member pilots union, a federal appeals court ruled on Monday.

In a 3-0 decision, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association sufficiently pleaded that the Dallas-based carrier had “anti-union animus” to allow the dispute to proceed in federal court.

A lower court judge had ruled that the dispute was minor and therefore belonged in arbitration.

The case stemmed from Southwest’s decision to strip Timothy Roebling of his responsibilities and pay as a “check pilot,” a special group of about 300 pilots who work closely with management and train other pilots.

Southwest ostensibly cited Roebling’s use of a vulgarity to justify the discipline, but the union said it resulted from his decision to join the union’s check pilot committee.

Writing for the New Orleans-based appeals court panel, Chief Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod agreed with the lower court judge that the dispute was a minor matter under the federal Railway Labor Act.

But she said accusations that Southwest made check pilots fearful of retaliation for associating with the union, and that Roebling’s boss threatened to strip him of his qualifications, made this case different.

These kinds of allegations “sufficiently support the union’s claim that Southwest intended to ‘weaken’ or ‘destroy’ the operational capacity of the union,” she wrote.

Southwest said in a statement it disagreed with the court’s decision and vehemently denied the union’s allegations. “We are evaluating our options,” it added.

Lawyers for the union did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The appeals court returned the case to U.S. District Judge Barbara Lynn in Dallas federal court, who had dismissed it in September 2023.

The case is Southwest Airlines Pilots Association v Southwest Airlines Co, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-11065.

 

Related Post