Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Analysis Economy Featured News

Intel is bringing back one of its most frustrating types of CPUs

post-img

Intel’s new Arrow Lake CPUs are a big deal. They utilize an entirely new architecture and come with a new socket, which will help them compete for a spot among the best processors. However, it looks like some upcoming Core 200-series CPUs (the non-Ultra versions) might not use the Arrow Lake/Lunar Lake architecture at all — they might be rebranded CPUs sporting older CPU tech.

The assumption comes from results in the Crossmark benchmark that were posted to Bapco and first pointed out by Everest on X (formerly Twitter). The result shows the Core 5 210H, but it’s not the performance that’s interesting. It’s the specs. The result shows that the CPU comes with eight cores and 12 threads. That’s the rub. Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake don’t come with Hyper-Threading, so each core only comes with a single thread.

This isn’t new for Intel. The company rebranded Raptor Lake (13th-gen) processors under its Meteor Lake branding with the Core-U (Series 1) lineup, and it looks like we’ll see something similar happen again here. As pointed out by Tom’s Hardware, the performance of the Core 5 210H in this benchmark is actually a bit lower than the Core i5-12450H, so it’s definitely possible that Intel will use branded Alder Lake and Raptor Lake chips for the non-Ultra Core 200 range.

It’s important to highlight that this only applies to laptops, at least right now. Although the desktop Arrow Lake and mobile Lunar Lake chips use the same architecture, Intel divides them up in different ways. A Core Ultra 200S processor is Arrow Lake for desktops, while a Core Ultra 200V is Lunar Lake for mobile. Intel also says it plans to release higher-end Arrow Lake chips for laptops using the H or HX suffix.

The ones you need to watch out for are the non-Ultra chips like the Core 5 210H. Based on this benchmark, it looks like these CPUs are using an older architecture, just with a new name. Intel will likely launch these CPUs without much fanfare and target them at budget laptops over the next several months.

Arrow Lake CPUs aren’t here yet, but Intel is releasing them on October 24 for desktop — the mobile range should arrive shortly after, likely targeting high-end gaming laptops where Lunar Lake might not make sense. Once it’s here, it’ll be tough to know what CPU you’re getting, at least in a laptop. If Intel is indeed using both repurposed Alder Lake and Raptor Lake designs for the non-Ultra Core 200 series, you’ll have to do some digging on the individual CPU model to see what you’re really getting.

Related Post